A new and simple score to predict adequate and deep response to ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: the ALP-A score.

BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), but a significant proportion of patients do not respond adequately, leading to increased risk of adverse outcomes. This study aims to develop a new and straightforward predictive score to identify PBC patients likely to achieve a complete response to UDCA. METHODS: A logistic regression analysis was conducted using a derivation cohort of PBC patients to identify pre-treatment variables associated with response to UDCA. This analysis led to the development of the ALP-A score, calculated as: Age at diagnosis divided by (alkaline phosphatase at diagnosis/upper limit of normal). ALP-A score accuracy was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve, validated with a large external cohort from Brazil. Additionally, the correlation between the ALP-A score and the previously validated UDCA response score (URS) was assessed. RESULTS: ALP-A score had good predictive power for adequate (AUC 0.794; 95% CI, 0.737-0.852) and deep (0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.83) UDCA response at 1 year of treatment. A cutoff score of 17 and 23 points was determined to be the optimal threshold for distinguishing adequate and deep responders, respectively, from non-responders. ALP-A score demonstrated a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 71%, positive predictive value of 65%, negative predictive value of 78%, and overall accuracy of 72% for biochemical response. The URS displayed similar discriminative ability (AUC 0.798; 95% CI, 0.741-0.855). CONCLUSION: ALP-A score performs comparably to URS but offers the great advantage of simplicity for routine clinical use. It serves as a valuable tool to identify PBC patients less likely to respond to UDCA treatment, facilitating early consideration of alternative therapeutic approaches.

Estudo das prevalências de distúrbios metabólicos em pacientes obesos e em portadores de hepatite C / Study of prevalence of metabolic disorders in obese patients and in patients with hepatitis C

Introdução: a infecção crônica pelo vírus da hepatite C (HCV) e a obesidade podem induzir esteatose hepática e diabetes mellitus (DM). Objetivo: avaliar a prevalência de obesidade e de distúrbios metabólicos em pacientes com HCV; estudar a prevalência de HCV e os distúrbios metabólicos em pacientes obesos. Comparar o perfil glicêmico entre os grupos. Metodologia: estudo analítico, com pacientes acompanhados nos ambulatórios de Hepatite C e Obesidade. Variáveis analisadas: glicemia, hemoglobina glicada (A1C), esteatose hepática, HCV, estágio de fibrose hepática e dados sociodemográficos. Resultados: no ambulatório de obesidade 45 pacientes foram avaliados, dos quais 6,7% tinham hepatite C, 40% DM e 61-73% esteatose hepática. As médias das enzimas hepáticas (U/L) foram: AST 22,9; ALT 25,2; FAL 146,5 e GGT 63. Nos obesos com DM, 72,2% apresentavam A1C < 7%. A segunda amostra continha 159 portadores de HCV do ambulatório de hepatologia: 17,9% tinham obesidade, 18,9% DM e 27% esteatose hepática. As médias das enzimas hepáticas (U/L) consistiram em: AST 70,5; ALT 90,6; FAL 108,5 e GGT 131,7. Entre os diabéticos com HCV, 52% não apresentavam A1C < 7%. Conclusão: foi encontrada alta prevalência de hepatite C em pacientes com obesidade (6,7%) quando comparados com a população de Salvador (1,5-1,8%). Os distúrbios metabólicos foram mais frequentes entre obesos, porém os diabéticos com obesidade revelaram A1C menores do que os diabéticos com HCV, sugerindo, neste estudo, que pode existir interferência viral no controle glicídico. A esteatose hepática foi mais prevalente entre obesos.

Introduction: Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) and Obesity can to induce hepatic steatosis and diabetes mellitus (DM). Objectives: to evaluate the prevalence of obesity and metabolic disorders in HCV viremic patients. To study the prevalence of hepatitis C and metabolic disorders in patients with obesity. To compare glycemic profile between the groups. Methods: analytical study, with patients followed up at hepatitis C and Obesity outpatient clinics patients. Variables studied: blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin (A1C), hepatic steatosis, HCV, hepatic fibrosis stage and sociodemographic data. Results: in Obesity clinic sample 45 patients were evaluated, 6,7% was hepatitis C, 40% DM and 61% -73% hepatic steatosis. Mean of liver enzymes levels (U/L) were: AST 22.9; ALT 25.2; FAL 146.5 and GGT 63. In obese with DM, 72.2% of them were able to maintain A1C < 7%. The second sample contained 159 HCV carriers at the hepatology clinic, 17,9% was Obesity, 18,9% DM and 27% hepatic steatosis. Averages of serum liver enzymes level (U/ L) were: AST 70.5; ALT 90.6; FAL 108.5 and GGT 131.7. Among diabetics with HCV, 52% are unable to maintain A1C < 7%. Conclusions: found high prevalence of hepatitis C in patients with obesity (6.7%) when compared to the population of Salvador (1.5%-1.8%). Metabolic disorders were more frequent in the obese group, but diabetics with obesity have lower A1C values than diabetics with HCV, suggesting, in this study, that there may be a viral interference with glycid control. Liver steatosis is more prevalent among obese people